Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Limitations on Criminal History Inquires for San Francisco Employers

Published

Effective August 13, 2014, the Fair Chance Ordinance restricts the ability of private San Francisco employers with 20 or more employees to inquire about and consider criminal history information for employment purposes. The Ordinance’s protections apply to applicants or employees whose place of employment is entirely or substantially located in San Francisco.
The Ordinance prohibits covered employers from making any inquiry regarding criminal history until after an initial job interview. The Ordinance specifically prohibits “check the box” type questions, which ask applicants and employees to provide information regarding criminal history. The Ordinance also specifies that employers may not indirectly ask about criminal history through the use of a background check or other means, until after an initial interview. Then, prior to conducting any criminal history inquiry, the employer must provide the applicant or employee with written notice of their rights under the Ordinance. In the event that an employer learns of criminal history information, the employer is limited in its ability to consider that information as a bar to employment. Rather, the employer must conduct an individualized assessment of the nature of the offense as it relates to the specific job position at issue, and may only consider the offense as a bar to employment if it has a “direct and specific negative bearing on that person’s ability to perform the duties or responsibilities necessarily related to the employment position.” If an employer does determine that it must take an adverse action against an employee or applicant based on criminal history information (such as a demotion, refusal to hire, termination, or failure to promote), the employer must first notify the applicant or employee of the intended decision in writing and allow the individual a week to respond.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

When “Training Agreements” Become Forced Labor: Federal Court Applies Anti- Trafficking Laws to Coercive Employment Contracts

A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois highlights that forced labor and human trafficking laws apply far beyond what most people imagine as traditional trafficking scenarios. In Melone v. Niki Moon Salon, LLC, Case No. 25-C-5445 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2025) (Gettleman, J.), the court allowed claims under the federal Trafficking Victims’ Protection Act (TVPA) and the Illinois Trafficking Victims’ Protection Act (ITVPA) to proceed based on an employer’s use of a coercive...

Read More
Blog

Illinois Expands Protections for Whistleblowers

Illinois employees who speak up about unlawful workplace conduct now have stronger legal protections under recent amendments to the Illinois Whistleblower Act. These changes expand the types of disclosures that are protected and broaden what qualifies as unlawful retaliation– making it easier for employees to assert their rights when they are punished for doing the right thing. Expanded Protection for Speaking Up Under the amended law, employers may not retaliate against an employee who discloses– or threatens to disclose– information...

Read More
Blog

Court Rejects Defendant’s Attempt to Evade Illinois Biometric Privacy Law Under Government Contractor Exemption

Caffarelli & Associates secured a significant victory for workers’ biometric privacy rights this week when a Cook County court denied Total Airport Services, LLC’s motion to dismiss a class action brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The ruling allows the case to move forward on behalf of employees whose fingerprints were allegedly collected without the disclosures and consent required by Illinois law. The court agreed with Caffarelli & Associates that the defendant failed to establish it was...

Read More