Caffarelli & Martin Ltd

News

2 minutes read

Limitations on Criminal History Inquires for San Francisco Employers

Published

Effective August 13, 2014, the Fair Chance Ordinance restricts the ability of private San Francisco employers with 20 or more employees to inquire about and consider criminal history information for employment purposes. The Ordinance’s protections apply to applicants or employees whose place of employment is entirely or substantially located in San Francisco.
The Ordinance prohibits covered employers from making any inquiry regarding criminal history until after an initial job interview. The Ordinance specifically prohibits “check the box” type questions, which ask applicants and employees to provide information regarding criminal history. The Ordinance also specifies that employers may not indirectly ask about criminal history through the use of a background check or other means, until after an initial interview. Then, prior to conducting any criminal history inquiry, the employer must provide the applicant or employee with written notice of their rights under the Ordinance. In the event that an employer learns of criminal history information, the employer is limited in its ability to consider that information as a bar to employment. Rather, the employer must conduct an individualized assessment of the nature of the offense as it relates to the specific job position at issue, and may only consider the offense as a bar to employment if it has a “direct and specific negative bearing on that person’s ability to perform the duties or responsibilities necessarily related to the employment position.” If an employer does determine that it must take an adverse action against an employee or applicant based on criminal history information (such as a demotion, refusal to hire, termination, or failure to promote), the employer must first notify the applicant or employee of the intended decision in writing and allow the individual a week to respond.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Caffarelli & Martin Secures Class Certification in Biometric Privacy Case Against Aimbridge

Caffarelli & Martin, Ltd. (p/k/a Caffarelli & Associates) is pleased to announce a significant victory for Illinois workers in Gutierrez v. Aimbridge Employee Service Corp. and Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC. On June 2, 2026, Judge Caroline Kate Moreland of the Circuit Court of Cook County granted Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification in a lawsuit brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, commonly known as BIPA. The case concerns Aimbridge-managed hotels in Illinois that allegedly required employees to use UltiPro...

Read More
Blog

Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. Secures Unanimous Jury Verdict in Sexual Harassment Case Against El Milagro

Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. is proud to announce a trial victory on behalf of Lilia Carrillo in her hostile work environment sexual harassment case against El-Milagro, Inc. d/b/a El Milagro under the Illinois Human Rights Act. After a five-day jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, the jury unanimously found in favor of the Plaintiff. The case was tried by Alejandro Caffarelli and Whitney Barr of Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. Ms. Carrillo worked for a placement company,...

Read More
Blog

Alexis Martin Quoted in Borderless Magazine

Alexis D. Martin of Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. was recently quoted in a Borderless Magazine article discussing the growing delays in DACA renewal processing and the legal uncertainty many recipients are facing under current immigration policies. The article highlights the significant impact these delays are having on work authorization, employment, and deportation concerns for DACA recipients across the country. You can read the full article here.

Read More