Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Katherine Stryker Joins Caffarelli & Associates Ltd.

Published

Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. is proud to announce that Katherine Stryker has joined the firm as an Associate (admission pending). Ms. Stryker received her Juris Doctorate from Chicago-Kent College of Law in May of 2019, where she graduated with a joint certificate in Alternative Dispute Resolution & Workplace Litigation.
During law school, Ms. Stryker worked diligently to gain practical experience outside of the classroom—focusing primarily on employment litigation. Ms. Stryker’s time working as a law clerk at two Chicago-based law firms allowed her to gain hands-on experience in every stage of pre-trial litigation, including drafting complaints, discovery requests and responses, and substantive motions. Working on both the plaintiff and defense side has taught her to be versatile and has prepared her to analyze legal issues through different lenses. Additionally, as a judicial extern in the Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County for Judge Diane J. Larsen, Ms. Stryker regularly undertook in-depth analyses into a wide variety of complex legal issues.
Ms. Stryker was also an active member of the Moot Court Honor Society at Chicago-Kent, where she served as Vice President for the 2018-19 academic year. Ms. Stryker competed in a number of appellate advocacy competitions, including the Hunton Andrews Kurth National Moot Court Championship held annually in Houston, Texas. In the spring of 2018, Ms. Stryker received the award for Second Best Oral Advocate at the Evans A. Evans Constitutional Law Moot Court competition out of a field of 52 advocates. That same year, Ms. Stryker was awarded Best Overall Advocate when studying appellate advocacy abroad at St. Andrews University in Scotland. Aside from appellate advocacy, Ms. Stryker received the CALI Award for earning the highest grade in Trial Advocacy I, and she remained on the Dean’s List each semester. Ms. Stryker sat for the July 2019 Illinois Bar Exam and her admission is pending.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More