Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Employment Policy Goals under the Biden Administration

Published

During his presidential campaign and since his election in November 2020, President Biden has stressed his commitment to strengthening workers’ rights and improving work conditions in the U.S. He identified three primary focus areas to that end: Tamping down corporate abuses of power in the employment context; incentivizing workforce organization and collective bargaining; and improving the standards for pay, benefits, and protections at all workplaces. Chief among these, he has voiced support for increasing the federal minimum wage – which has sat stagnant at $7.25 per hour for over a decade – to $15 per hour.

Several other goals have also crystallized in the Biden administration’s early days. Some of these are tied directly to efforts to blunt the economic and other devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on workers. These include expanding unemployment benefits through September 2021, providing back hazard pay to frontline and other essential workers; renewing and expanding coverage of the paid sick and family leave provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act; and authorizing OSHA to issue and enforce a nationwide COVID-19 protection standard.

Outside of the pandemic response context, other policy goals include adopting a relaxed, straightforward test for determining joint employer liability under the FLSA and labor laws; making misclassification of employees as independent contractors a substantive violation of federal law; requiring employers bidding for federal contracts to demonstrate historic compliance with labor and employment laws; and dramatically expanding the definition of an employee under the National Labor Relations Act to capture more workers currently excluded as independent contractors and supervisors.

With the Senate now under narrow democratic control, it remains to be seen whether – and how – the administration can achieve these goals. If President Biden is unable to accomplish his desired ends through formal legislation, he may turn to executive orders to implement his new policies.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More