Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alejandro Caffarelli Invited to Speak at CBA, Institute for Law in the Workplace

Published

Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. attorney Alejandro Caffarelli was recently invited to speak on panels at the Chicago Bar Association, as well as Chicago-Kent Law School’s Institute of Law in the Workplace.
On Wednesday, December 11, 2019, Mr. Caffarelli presented “The Biometric Information Privacy Act after Rosenbach – A Survey of the Legal Landscape” with Alan S. Wernick of Aronberg Goldgehn.
Mr. Caffarelli & Mr. Wernick discussed the Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) 740 ILCS 14/1 et seq., as well as the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Rosenbach v Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, 2019 IL 123186 (January 25, 2019). In Rosenbach, the Illinois Supreme Court held “…an individual need not allege some actual injury or adverse effect, beyond violation of his or her rights under the Act [BIPA], in order to qualify as an ‘aggrieved’ person and be entitled to seek liquidated damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Act.”
And on Friday, December 6, 2019, Mr. Caffarelli presented “The Growth of State and Local Employment Laws: Protecting Workers or Complicating Things?” with Tracey Truesdale of Franczek PC. Mr. Caffarelli and Ms. Truesdale discussed the political polarization of employment legislation at the federal level, and how it has led to the proliferation of employment laws at the state and local level. They addressed recent developments in Illinois, Cook County and Chicago, including minimum wage, paid sick leave, business expense reimbursement and employee privacy concerns and how issues like preemption and concurrent jurisdiction play a part in asserting and defending claims.
For further information, please contact Alejandro Caffarelli at www.caffarelli.com.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More