(312) 763-6880

Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alejandro Caffarelli and Madeline Engel Prevail in Federal Jury Trial

Published

Alejandro Caffarelli and Madeline Engel Prevail in Federal Jury Trial:

On November 16, 2018, a federal jury returned a verdict in favor of Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. client N.V. Ms. V was a former school administrator for a suburban school district, who shortly after being promoted started suffering from debilitating mental health conditions including depression and anxiety. Despite showing outward manifestations of her condition, crying uncontrollably, and requesting (and being denied) a changed schedule so that she could bring her unexplained symptoms under control, the school principal accepted her resignation without first notifying Ms. V of her right to take leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act – a resignation that would not have taken place but for the fact that Ms. V was suffering from these medical conditions. The verdict is significant in that it reaffirms the rights of people suffering mental disabilities to take leaves of absence under the Family and Medical Leave Act, and that an employer cannot turn a blind eye when an employee is in need of assistance. For further information please contact Alejandro Caffarelli or Madeline Engel at Caffarelli & Associates, Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More