Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alejandro Caffarelli & Alexis Martin Prevail in Federal FLSA Trial

Published

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Alejandro Caffarelli and Alexis Martin of Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. tried a case before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Soat Brown in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Mr. Caffarelli and Ms. Martin represented Plaintiff Juan Valentin Hernandez against The View restaurant, the Defendant. Mr. Hernandez was a former cook for the View who was paid a fixed salary instead of on an hourly basis, and who regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per week. The day-long bench trial focused on whether the Defendants had failed to pay the Plaintiff overtime wages, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL). On May 11, 2016, the Court issued a decision in favor of Mr. Hernandez, holding that “[a]n employer cannot lawfully agree with its employees that they will receive the same sum, comprising both straight time and overtime compensation, in all weeks without regard to the number of overtime hours worked in any workweek. 29 C.F.R. § 778.500(b). Likewise, an employer does not comply with the law by paying a fixed salary or paying a lump sum for overtime.” Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. is proud to represent employees from all walks of life, from restaurant workers to Fortune 50 executives. For a copy of the Court’s opinion, or for further information about the trail or any other matter, please contact the Firm at (312) 763-6880.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More