Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

3 minutes read

Pragmatic Changes Arrive for Illinois Practitioners

Published

When it comes time for briefing, Illinois practitioners will find a dearth of State case law as compared with federal decisions. In part, this is due to the fact that federal trial courts may have their opinions published whereas Illinois trial courts rarely issue written opinions, let alone have them easily accessible online. Considering that the Circuit Court of Cook County – the nation’s second largest unified court system – still uses handwritten orders and carbon paper, this is hardly surprising. Yet, when crafting an argument, perhaps the most aggravating stumbling block has been Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23.

Due to the fact that research was primarily limited to books, in the 1990s the Illinois Supreme Court decided to limit the number of precedential decisions because, according to Chief Justice Michael A. Bilandic there was “an avalanche” of Appellate Court decisions that were too lengthy for publication in the reporters. As a result, a substantial number of appellate decisions were tacked with the Rule 23-U designation, which prohibited parties from citing the opinions except in very narrow circumstances. In the past decade, books have been largely abandoned in favor of online research services. Thankfully, the Illinois Supreme Court has now recognized that these technological changes have effectively rendered the original purpose for Rule 23 moot. As a result, effective January 1, 2021, Rule 23 has been amended to allow practitioners to cite such cases for their persuasive value, which is a pragmatic amendment that will benefit parties and practitioners by providing greater guidance. Additionally, for the first time in two decades, Cook County has a new Circuit Court Clerk. Iris Martinez assumed the office of Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County in December 2020.

The outgoing Clerk, Dorothy Brown’s tenure was marked by a number of scandals and criticisms levelled at her office for cumbersome processes and archaic systems. While other Illinois circuit courts had already implemented call-in procedures for certain proceedings, it took a global pandemic for Cook County to utilize remote hearings. Indeed, many judges now require electronic courtesy copies and their clerks have taken to corresponding with attorneys by email. Ms. Martinez campaigned on a promise to modernize Cook County’s technology. This past year revealed that the Cook County Circuit Court Clerk’s office can move rapidly when necessary. Perhaps with Ms. Martinez at the helm, the Clerk’s office will finally address many of its longstanding technological deficiencies to increase accessibility and streamline proceedings. We are particularly interested to see if the Clerk creates online access to case files, streamlines the existing e-filing system, if Zoom hearings continue, and, of course, if carbon paper will finally be retired.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More