Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Supreme Court Rules Against Amazon Workers

Published

The Supreme Court today held that Amazon.com warehouse workers need not be paid for the time they spend going through the company’s mandatory security checks. The court reversed a lower court ruling for the workers, who claimed that they spent up to 25 minutes waiting to go through security lines so that Amazon could ensure they were not stealing products. Justice Clarence Thomas authored the unanimous opinion, which held that federal law requires that workers be paid for activities before and after their shifts only when the activities are “integral and indispensable” to the job they are hired to perform.
The good news for workers is that the decision did not radically alter existing law for those individuals that should be compensated. For example, in previous cases, the court has identified activities that qualify as integral and indispensable to a worker’s duties such as battery-plant employees who spend showering and changing. This time is compensable because of the toxic chemicals in the plant. The court also noted that meatpacking workers should be paid for sharpening knives because dull knives would make them less effective and affect the appearance of the product. To read the Supreme Court’s decision, click here.
If you or someone you know has not been paid for performing pre-shift or post-shift work that is integral and indispensable for work, such as putting on or taking off safety equipment off the clock, contact employment lawyer Alejandro Caffarelli at Caffarelli & Associates, Ltd.
 

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Northern District Encourages Updated Definition of “Product”

Additional case law has been added to the proposition that a “product” can include items such as software. In Penzick v. Constrafor Inc., 25 C 4555 N.D. Ill. (Jan. 29, 2026) (Durkin, J.), Judge Durkin called the argument that “software is intangible property” and thus not a product “an obsolete perspective.” Defendant moved to dismiss Count I of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which was brought under the Illinois Sales Representative Act (“SRA”). 820 ILCS 120/1(1). Defendant argued that it was not liable...

Read More
Blog

Trauma Informed Lawyering in Workplace Sexual Harassment and Abuse Cases

At Caffarelli & Associates, we take great care in representing survivors of workplace sexual harassment and abuse. We understand that coming forward about sexual misconduct at work is not only a legal step, but a deeply personal one. Many survivors carry the effects of trauma long after the harassment or assault occurs. We approach every case with care, respect, and sensitivity. Trauma-informed advocacy means we recognize the impact that workplace harassment and assault can have on a person. We prioritize...

Read More
Blog

When “Training Agreements” Become Forced Labor: Federal Court Applies Anti- Trafficking Laws to Coercive Employment Contracts

A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois highlights that forced labor and human trafficking laws apply far beyond what most people imagine as traditional trafficking scenarios. In Melone v. Niki Moon Salon, LLC, Case No. 25-C-5445 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2025) (Gettleman, J.), the court allowed claims under the federal Trafficking Victims’ Protection Act (TVPA) and the Illinois Trafficking Victims’ Protection Act (ITVPA) to proceed based on an employer’s use of a coercive...

Read More