Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Obama Administration Greatly Expands Overtime Eligibility

Published

Generally speaking, even salaried employees are automatically entitled to receive 1.5 their regular hourly rate so long as their annual salary falls beneath a certain threshold, currently $23,660, regardless of job duties or title. But on Monday night, President Obama announced in an op-ed Huffington Post article that he will direct the U.S. Department of Labor to issue new regulations raising the minimum annual salary under which an employer must pay overtime. The new regulations will raise the regular hourly rate, from $23,660 to $50,440 and will likely take effect in 2016. Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. applauds this move, which will benefit millions of low-wage workers nationwide. The overtime eligibility threshold has been frozen at $23,660 for years, a product of politics that failed to match the inflation. As a result, the regulations failed to live up to the purpose of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is to help low wage workers balance work and family obligations, and to incentivize employers to hire more employees rather than working the existing ones harder, with the attendant benefits to the U.S. economy. By increasing the number of employees income inequality is reduced, which lowers the strain on social services and helps fund public assistance programs such as social security and medicare through increased payroll head counts. If you or someone you know has been denied overtime, or has been subjected to retaliation for demanding it, please contact us at www.caffarelli.com.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More