Caffarelli & Martin Ltd

News

3 minutes read

Illinois Expands Protections for Whistleblowers

Published

Illinois employees who speak up about unlawful workplace conduct now have stronger legal protections under recent amendments to the Illinois Whistleblower Act. These changes expand the types of disclosures that are protected and broaden what qualifies as unlawful retaliation– making it easier for employees to assert their rights when they are punished for doing the right thing.

Expanded Protection for Speaking Up

Under the amended law, employers may not retaliate against an employee who discloses– or threatens to disclose– information about the employer’s conduct when the employee has a good faith belief that the employer has violated the law or created a substantial and specific danger to employees, public health, or safety.

Importantly, the amendments protect disclosures made in a variety of settings, including:

  • During an investigation, court case, or administrative proceeding, such as a government inquiry or lawsuit;
  • To a government agency or law enforcement, when an employee reasonably believes the employer has engaged in illegal conduct or poses a serious safety risk; and
  • Internally, including disclosures made to a supervisor, company officer, board member, or even to a supervisor at another organization that has a contractual relationship with the employer.

These changes recognize that employees should be protected whether they report concerns internally or externally– and whether the disclosure is formal or informal.

Protection for Refusing to Break the Law

The amendments also strengthen protections for employees who refuse to participate in unlawful activity. An employer may not retaliate against an employee who refuses to engage in conduct that the employee reasonably and in good faith believes would violate the law or regulations.

Broader Definition of Illegal Retaliation

The amended Act clarifies that retaliation is not limited to termination or demotion. Retaliatory action includes any adverse action that would discourage a reasonable employee from making a protected disclosure or refusal.

The law specifically includes:

  • Actions that interfere with an employee’s future employment opportunities; and
  • Immigration-related retaliation, including threatening to report or actually reporting an employee to immigration authorities, which is expressly prohibited.

This expanded definition helps protect employees from subtle or coercive forms of retaliation that are often used to silence whistleblowers.

Know Your Rights

If you were disciplined, terminated, or threatened after reporting illegal conduct or refusing to participate in it, you may have a claim under the Illinois Whistleblower Act.

Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. represents employees who have experienced retaliation for whistleblowing. If you believe your rights were violated, we can help you understand your options.

By Whitney L. Barr, Caffarelli & Martin Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Caffarelli & Martin Secures Class Certification in Biometric Privacy Case Against Aimbridge

Caffarelli & Martin, Ltd. (p/k/a Caffarelli & Associates) is pleased to announce a significant victory for Illinois workers in Gutierrez v. Aimbridge Employee Service Corp. and Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC. On June 2, 2026, Judge Caroline Kate Moreland of the Circuit Court of Cook County granted Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification in a lawsuit brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, commonly known as BIPA. The case concerns Aimbridge-managed hotels in Illinois that allegedly required employees to use UltiPro...

Read More
Blog

Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. Secures Unanimous Jury Verdict in Sexual Harassment Case Against El Milagro

Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. is proud to announce a trial victory on behalf of Lilia Carrillo in her hostile work environment sexual harassment case against El-Milagro, Inc. d/b/a El Milagro under the Illinois Human Rights Act. After a five-day jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, the jury unanimously found in favor of the Plaintiff. The case was tried by Alejandro Caffarelli and Whitney Barr of Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. Ms. Carrillo worked for a placement company,...

Read More
Blog

Alexis Martin Quoted in Borderless Magazine

Alexis D. Martin of Caffarelli & Martin Ltd. was recently quoted in a Borderless Magazine article discussing the growing delays in DACA renewal processing and the legal uncertainty many recipients are facing under current immigration policies. The article highlights the significant impact these delays are having on work authorization, employment, and deportation concerns for DACA recipients across the country. You can read the full article here.

Read More