Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

3 minutes read

Illinois Expands Protections for Whistleblowers

Published

Illinois employees who speak up about unlawful workplace conduct now have stronger legal protections under recent amendments to the Illinois Whistleblower Act. These changes expand the types of disclosures that are protected and broaden what qualifies as unlawful retaliation– making it easier for employees to assert their rights when they are punished for doing the right thing.

Expanded Protection for Speaking Up

Under the amended law, employers may not retaliate against an employee who discloses– or threatens to disclose– information about the employer’s conduct when the employee has a good faith belief that the employer has violated the law or created a substantial and specific danger to employees, public health, or safety.

Importantly, the amendments protect disclosures made in a variety of settings, including:

  • During an investigation, court case, or administrative proceeding, such as a government inquiry or lawsuit;
  • To a government agency or law enforcement, when an employee reasonably believes the employer has engaged in illegal conduct or poses a serious safety risk; and
  • Internally, including disclosures made to a supervisor, company officer, board member, or even to a supervisor at another organization that has a contractual relationship with the employer.

These changes recognize that employees should be protected whether they report concerns internally or externally– and whether the disclosure is formal or informal.

Protection for Refusing to Break the Law

The amendments also strengthen protections for employees who refuse to participate in unlawful activity. An employer may not retaliate against an employee who refuses to engage in conduct that the employee reasonably and in good faith believes would violate the law or regulations.

Broader Definition of Illegal Retaliation

The amended Act clarifies that retaliation is not limited to termination or demotion. Retaliatory action includes any adverse action that would discourage a reasonable employee from making a protected disclosure or refusal.

The law specifically includes:

  • Actions that interfere with an employee’s future employment opportunities; and
  • Immigration-related retaliation, including threatening to report or actually reporting an employee to immigration authorities, which is expressly prohibited.

This expanded definition helps protect employees from subtle or coercive forms of retaliation that are often used to silence whistleblowers.

Know Your Rights

If you were disciplined, terminated, or threatened after reporting illegal conduct or refusing to participate in it, you may have a claim under the Illinois Whistleblower Act.

Caffarelli & Associates represents employees who have experienced retaliation for whistleblowing. If you believe your rights were violated, we can help you understand your options.

By Whitney L. Barr, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Illinois Supreme Court Expands Pay Rights for Pre-Shift Work Under Wage Law

In a major win for Illinois workers, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that employees may be entitled to pay for required pre-shift and post-shift activities—even when federal law would not require compensation. The landmark ruling strengthens employee rights to compensation for required workplace activities. In Johnson v. Amazon.com Services, LLC, the court addressed whether the Illinois Minimum Wage Law adopts a major limitation from federal law that excludes certain “preliminary” and “postliminary” activities from paid time. The court answered no....

Read More
Blog

Figueroa and the Fight Over Who Gets to Enforce Workplace Rights in Illinois

A recent Cook County decision in Figueroa v. Visual Pak Holdings, LLC  (available at Figueroa v Visual Pak 3_6_26-1-Opinion) could have major consequences for temporary workers in Illinois and for the organizations that help them enforce their rights. In March 2026, the court held that Section 67 of the Illinois Day and Temporary Labor Services Act (IDTLSA)—the provision allowing an “interested party” to sue over alleged violations—was unconstitutional. The court concluded that the statute improperly gave private organizations authority that...

Read More
Blog

Whitney Barr Featured in CBA Record

Caffarelli & Associates associate attorney Whitney Barr is featured in the March/April 2026 issue of the CBA Record, where she explores the important role juries should play in sexual-harassment cases. Whitney argues that courts too often dismiss these claims at summary judgment, even though they turn on fact-intensive questions about workplace conduct, harm, and credibility. Her article explains why juries are often better positioned to evaluate whether harassment was severe enough to violate the law and why preserving that role...

Read More