Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

1 minute read

Chicago City Council Approves Sick Leave Ordinance

Published

The Chicago City Council last week approved an ordinance requiring employers to provide their employees with paid sick leave. The law will benefit over 450,000 private sector workers in the City of Chicago. The new law, which takes effect on July 2017, requires employees to be given one hour of sick time for every 40 hours they work, up to a maximum of five paid sick days per year. Employees can roll over up to 2.5 unused sick days into the following year.
According to the National Partnership for Women and Families, Chicago joins a number of other states and cities that have recently passed paid sick leave legislation, including but not limited to California, Connecticut, Oregon, San Francisco, Seattle, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. Los Angeles and Minneapolis also passed sick leave legislation earlier this year. For more information on employee rights, contact Caffarelli & Associates, Ltd. at www.caffarelli.com.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Figueroa and the Fight Over Who Gets to Enforce Workplace Rights in Illinois

A recent Cook County decision in Figueroa v. Visual Pak Holdings, LLC  (available at Figueroa v Visual Pak 3_6_26-1-Opinion) could have major consequences for temporary workers in Illinois and for the organizations that help them enforce their rights. In March 2026, the court held that Section 67 of the Illinois Day and Temporary Labor Services Act (IDTLSA)—the provision allowing an “interested party” to sue over alleged violations—was unconstitutional. The court concluded that the statute improperly gave private organizations authority that...

Read More
Blog

Whitney Barr Featured in CBA Record

Caffarelli & Associates associate attorney Whitney Barr is featured in the March/April 2026 issue of the CBA Record, where she explores the important role juries should play in sexual-harassment cases. Whitney argues that courts too often dismiss these claims at summary judgment, even though they turn on fact-intensive questions about workplace conduct, harm, and credibility. Her article explains why juries are often better positioned to evaluate whether harassment was severe enough to violate the law and why preserving that role...

Read More
Blog

Northern District Encourages Updated Definition of “Product”

Additional case law has been added to the proposition that a “product” can include items such as software. In Penzick v. Constrafor Inc., 25 C 4555 N.D. Ill. (Jan. 29, 2026) (Durkin, J.), Judge Durkin called the argument that “software is intangible property” and thus not a product “an obsolete perspective.” Defendant moved to dismiss Count I of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which was brought under the Illinois Sales Representative Act (“SRA”). 820 ILCS 120/1(1). Defendant argued that it was not liable...

Read More