Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alexis Martin Quoted in Law360 Article on the Recent Santiago NRLB Administrative Decision

Published

Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. attorney Alexis Martin was quoted in Law360 about a case that the NLRB brought on behalf of the firm’s client, Audelia Santiago. Ms. Santiago was formerly employed by the Tinley Park Hotel and Convention Center LLC, which operates a Holiday Inn outside Chicago. Ms. Santiago was fired after “selfie” photographs of her at work were posted to her Facebook account with the statement “working like an (sic) slave,” and after numerous employees and others commented on the photos. The NLRB brought the case before an ALJ on the basis that Ms. Santiago’s conduct constituted protected, concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). Finding in favor of Ms. Santiago, the Administrative Law Judge said Tinley Park Hotel’s policy on disloyalty, which formed the basis of her termination and included a prohibition on “making or publishing false or malicious statements” about the company, violates the NLRA because it could be interpreted to restrict activities protected under employees’ statutory right to organize. “The board repeatedly has found similar language to be unlawful,” the judge wrote. “[The rule] reasonably could be construed to prohibit protected activity, such as co-workers discussing with one another the complaints they have about their supervisors.” While indicating that she was “very pleased” with the ruling, Ms. Martin said that “[t]he opinion shows a very clear understanding of the problems that employees face in communication, the frequently blurred lines between personal and private lives, as well as the continuously developing role that technology plays in the way that people relate to one another.” Read the full Law360 article by clicking here. Download the Administrative Law Judge’s Opinion by clicking here.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

By Alejandro Caffarelli, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More
General

Supreme Court Rules on FLSA Evidence Standards in Overtime Exemption Case

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that disputes over Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemptions do not require heightened evidence standards. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, rejected employees’ arguments for a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, reaffirming that the preponderance of evidence standard is appropriate in civil litigation unless explicitly altered by statute, constitutional requirements, or precedent involving severe government actions. The case, EMD Sales Inc. v. Carrera, centered on whether a higher standard should apply in...

Read More