Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alexis Martin and Madeline Engel Prevail at Trial before the Illinois Human Rights Commission

Published

In August 2016, Alexis D. Martin and Madeline Engel of Caffarelli & Associates conducted a three-day trial before Administrative Law Judge William J. Borah at the Illinois Human Rights Commission. Ms. Martin and Ms. Engel represented Complainant, Claudia Torres, against Respondents, El Faro Restaurant and Adrian Reyes. Ms. Torres was a former waitress at El Faro who alleged that she had been sexually harassed by her supervisor and retaliated against when she complained about the harassment. On February 3, 2017, Judge Borah recommended a finding of liability against Respondents for subjecting Ms. Torres to a hostile work environment, which constitutes sexual harassment. Although Ms. Torres was the only witness to testify to Reyes’ harassment, Judge Borah recognized that a Complainant’s credible testimony alone is sufficient to sustain a finding of liability. Judge Borah found that, although Reyes did not make sexual advances or request sexual favors from Ms. Torres, “Reyes’s conduct created “an intimidating, hostile and offensive working environment.” Offensive terms and remarks describing sexual acts, bodily functions, and parts of the female anatomy constitute “conduct of a sexual nature.”” The Judge further found that the “verbal attacks were intentionally made to embarrass and humiliate Complainant. The verbal attacks were of a sexual nature, mostly related to employment directives or chastisements. The incidents were hurtful enough by the sheer number of them to cause emotional distress, as testified by Complainant.” This finding is an important recognition that sexual harassment exists in many forms, and that verbal attacks of a sexual nature – even when couched as a ‘joke’ or ‘employment discipline’ – are unlawful violations of the Illinois Human Rights Act. If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment at work, please contact the offices of Caffarelli & Associates, Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Figueroa and the Fight Over Who Gets to Enforce Workplace Rights in Illinois

A recent Cook County decision in Figueroa v. Visual Pak Holdings, LLC  (available at Figueroa v Visual Pak 3_6_26-1-Opinion) could have major consequences for temporary workers in Illinois and for the organizations that help them enforce their rights. In March 2026, the court held that Section 67 of the Illinois Day and Temporary Labor Services Act (IDTLSA)—the provision allowing an “interested party” to sue over alleged violations—was unconstitutional. The court concluded that the statute improperly gave private organizations authority that...

Read More
Blog

Whitney Barr Featured in CBA Record

Caffarelli & Associates associate attorney Whitney Barr is featured in the March/April 2026 issue of the CBA Record, where she explores the important role juries should play in sexual-harassment cases. Whitney argues that courts too often dismiss these claims at summary judgment, even though they turn on fact-intensive questions about workplace conduct, harm, and credibility. Her article explains why juries are often better positioned to evaluate whether harassment was severe enough to violate the law and why preserving that role...

Read More
Blog

Northern District Encourages Updated Definition of “Product”

Additional case law has been added to the proposition that a “product” can include items such as software. In Penzick v. Constrafor Inc., 25 C 4555 N.D. Ill. (Jan. 29, 2026) (Durkin, J.), Judge Durkin called the argument that “software is intangible property” and thus not a product “an obsolete perspective.” Defendant moved to dismiss Count I of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which was brought under the Illinois Sales Representative Act (“SRA”). 820 ILCS 120/1(1). Defendant argued that it was not liable...

Read More