Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Alejandro Caffarelli & Alexis Martin Prevail in Federal FLSA Trial

Published

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Alejandro Caffarelli and Alexis Martin of Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. tried a case before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Soat Brown in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Mr. Caffarelli and Ms. Martin represented Plaintiff Juan Valentin Hernandez against The View restaurant, the Defendant. Mr. Hernandez was a former cook for the View who was paid a fixed salary instead of on an hourly basis, and who regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per week. The day-long bench trial focused on whether the Defendants had failed to pay the Plaintiff overtime wages, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL). On May 11, 2016, the Court issued a decision in favor of Mr. Hernandez, holding that “[a]n employer cannot lawfully agree with its employees that they will receive the same sum, comprising both straight time and overtime compensation, in all weeks without regard to the number of overtime hours worked in any workweek. 29 C.F.R. § 778.500(b). Likewise, an employer does not comply with the law by paying a fixed salary or paying a lump sum for overtime.” Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. is proud to represent employees from all walks of life, from restaurant workers to Fortune 50 executives. For a copy of the Court’s opinion, or for further information about the trail or any other matter, please contact the Firm at (312) 763-6880.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

The Illinois Human Rights Act Expands to Protect Employees with Family Responsibilities

Effective January 1, 2025, Illinois employers are prohibited from discriminating against an employee or a prospective employee based on the employee’s “family responsibilities.” Employers cannot make recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, training, discharge, discipline, or other employment decisions based on an employees’ actual or perceived personal care responsibilities for a family member. The law references the Employee Sick Leave Act to define “family members” and “personal care.” Family members covered by the Act include: children, stepchildren, spouses, domestic partners,...

Read More
Blog

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Amidst Procedural Pitfalls

On June 9, 2025, the Seventh Circuit affirmed District Court Judge Kennelly’s decision in Anderson v. United Airlines, Inc., denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, dismissing the case. No. 24-1626 (7th Cir. June 9, 2025). If plaintiffs’ appeal had been successful Anderson would have added to a growing list of Seventh Circuit decisions regarding the viability of vaccine mandate claims in the employment realm. However, the Northern District, as affirmed by the Seventh Circuit, dismissed the case before...

Read More
Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and National Labor Relations Board,...

Read More