Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

2 minutes read

Illinois Limits the Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants

Published

by Nicole Young

On January 1, 2022, an employee-leaning amendment to the Illinois Freedom to Work Act (IFWA) took effect. In response to a growing national concern over lower-paid employees being burdened with post-employment restrictive covenants, the IFWA was amended to determine the enforceability of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements based on employee compensation. Specifically, non-compete agreements with employees earning less than $75,000 annually are now unenforceable, and employers are prohibited from entering into non-solicitation agreements with employees who earn less than $45,000 annually. These income thresholds will increase every five years until 2037.

The amended IFWA offers additional protections to employees outside of the income thresholds. To begin, the statute renders unenforceable non-compete and non-solicitation agreements where the employee is terminated, furloughed, or laid off as a result of certain circumstances related to COVID-19 or a similar situation, unless during the enforcement period the employer provides the employee with compensation equal to the employee’s base salary at the time of termination, minus compensation earned through subsequent employment during the enforcement period. It also requires at least two years or more of continued employment post-execution of a restrictive covenant, or alternatively, additional professional or financial benefits, in order for the covenant to be enforceable. Furthermore, employers must provide a copy of any non-compete and/or non-solicitation agreements to an employee 14 days prior to the start of employment and advise the employee in writing to consult with an attorney prior to signing. Moreover, an employee who prevails on an employer’s claim to enforce a restrictive covenant can recover all incurred costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Finally, employers who engage in a “pattern or practice” of violating the IFWA are subject to civil penalties.

These changes are not retroactive, applying only prospectively to non-compete and non-solicitation agreements entered into after the effective date. Still, they will likely make employers reconsider being overly aggressive in the drafting and enforcement of these types of restrictive covenants, offering much-needed relief to lower-paid employees. For additional information on this law or restrictive covenants generally, please contact Caffarelli & Associates Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Caffarelli & Martin Secures Class Certification in Biometric Privacy Case Against Aimbridge

Caffarelli & Martin, Ltd. (p/k/a Caffarelli & Associates) is pleased to announce a significant victory for Illinois workers in Gutierrez v. Aimbridge Employee Service Corp. and Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC. On June 2, 2026, Judge Caroline Kate Moreland of the Circuit Court of Cook County granted Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification in a lawsuit brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, commonly known as BIPA. The case concerns Aimbridge-managed hotels in Illinois that allegedly required employees to use UltiPro...

Read More
Blog

Caffarelli & Associates Secures Unanimous Jury Verdict in Sexual Harassment Case Against El Milagro

Caffarelli & Associates is proud to announce a trial victory on behalf of Lilia Carrillo in her hostile work environment sexual harassment case against El-Milagro, Inc. d/b/a El Milagro under the Illinois Human Rights Act. After a five-day jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, the jury unanimously found in favor of the Plaintiff. The case was tried by Alejandro Caffarelli and Whitney Barr of Caffarelli & Associates. Ms. Carrillo worked for a placement company, which assigned...

Read More
Blog

Alexis Martin Quoted in Borderless Magazine

Alexis D. Martin of Caffarelli & Associates Ltd. was recently quoted in a Borderless Magazine article discussing the growing delays in DACA renewal processing and the legal uncertainty many recipients are facing under current immigration policies. The article highlights the significant impact these delays are having on work authorization, employment, and deportation concerns for DACA recipients across the country. You can read the full article here.

Read More