Caffarelli & Associates LtD

News

1 minute read

The Illinois Human Rights Act Expands to Protect Employees with Family Responsibilities

Published

Effective January 1, 2025, Illinois employers are prohibited from discriminating against an employee or a prospective employee based on the employee’s “family responsibilities.” Employers cannot make recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, training, discharge, discipline, or other employment decisions based on an employees’ actual or perceived personal care responsibilities for a family member. The law references the Employee Sick Leave Act to define “family members” and “personal care.” Family members covered by the Act include: children, stepchildren, spouses, domestic partners, siblings, parents, in-laws, grandchildren, grandparent, or stepparents. Personal care includes but is not strictly limited to: taking a family member to a doctor’s appointment, providing support to a family member with a serious health condition who is receiving in patient or home care, and providing assistance with a family member’s basic medical, hygiene, nutritional or safety needs. Complainants will have two years after the date of the violation to file a charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights. If you believe your employer may have discriminated against you on the basis of your family responsibilities, please feel free to fill out a confidential intake form.

By Whitney L. Barr, Caffarelli & Associates Ltd.

Back to News

Recent Posts

Blog

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Amidst Procedural Pitfalls

On June 9, 2025, the Seventh Circuit affirmed District Court Judge Kennelly’s decision in Anderson v. United Airlines, Inc., denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, dismissing the case. No. 24-1626 (7th Cir. June 9, 2025). If plaintiffs’ appeal had been successful Anderson would have added to a growing list of Seventh Circuit decisions regarding the viability of vaccine mandate claims in the employment realm. However, the Northern District, as affirmed by the Seventh Circuit, dismissed the case before...

Read More
Blog

A Call for Comprehensive Fee Shifting for Employment-Law Claims

Access to justice in employment law remains an elusive promise for the vast majority of American workers. While an array of federal and state laws purport to protect workers, the mechanisms for enforcing those rights are often inaccessible, rendering them meaningless. Administrative agencies and state equivalents tasked with investigating discrimination and wage violations, for example, are often chronically underfunded and subject to political erosion. As demonstrated by recent changes at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and National Labor Relations Board,...

Read More
General

Supreme Court Bars State Administrative Hurdles for Federal Civil Rights Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday in the case of Williams v. Washington (No. 23-191) that an Alabama law requiring people to go through the state’s administrative process before filing federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is unconstitutional. The 5-4 decision found that the law created an unfair barrier to asserting federal rights. The law, upheld by Alabama’s Supreme Court in 2023, required unemployment benefits claimants to complete the state’s appeals process before going to court....

Read More